Balancing protection and empowerment is a central problem when specifying authorizations.
The principle of least privilege, the classical approach to balancing these two conflicting objectives, says that users shall only be authorized to execute the tasks necessary to complete their job. However, when there are multiple authorization configurations satisfying least privilege, which one should be chosen?
In this paper, we model the tasks that users must execute as workflows, and the risk and cost associated with authorization configurations and their administration. We then formulate the balancing of empowerment and protection as an optimization problem: finding a cost-minimizing authorization configuration that enables a successful workflow execution. We show that finding an optimal solution for a role-based cost function is NP-complete. We support our results with a series of examples, which we also use to measure the performance of our prototype implementation.
A shorted version of this Research Report has appeared in: Proc. 17th ACM Symp. on Access Control Models and Technologies "SACMAT," Newark, NJ (ACM. June 2012) 93-102.
By: D. Basin, S.J. Burri, G. Karjoth
Published in: RZ3815 in 2012
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION NOTICE:
This Research Report is available. This report has been submitted for publication outside of IBM and will probably be copyrighted if accepted for publication. It has been issued as a Research Report for early dissemination of its contents. In view of the transfer of copyright to the outside publisher, its distribution outside of IBM prior to publication should be limited to peer communications and specific requests. After outside publication, requests should be filled only by reprints or legally obtained copies of the article (e.g., payment of royalties). I have read and understand this notice and am a member of the scientific community outside or inside of IBM seeking a single copy only.
Questions about this service can be mailed to reports@us.ibm.com .