# On Syntactic versus Computational Views of Approximability

We attempt to reconcile the two distinct views of approximation classes: {\em syntactic} and {\em computational}. Syntactic classes such as MAX SNP allow for clean complexity-theoretic results and natural complete problems, while computational classes such as APX allow us to work with problems whose approximability is well-understood. Our results give a computational framework for studying syntactic classes, and provide a syntactic characterization of computational classes, as follows. We compare the syntactically defined class $\msnp$ with the computationally defined class APX and show that every problem in APX can be placed'' (i.e., L-reduced to a problem) in MAX SNP. Our methods introduce a general techique for creating approximation preserving reductions which show that any well'' approximable problem can be reduced (in an approximation preserving manner) to a problem which is hard to approximate to corresponding factors. We demonstrate this technique by applying it to the classes RMAX(2) and MIN$F^+\Pi_2$ which have the Set Cover problem and the Clique problem as complete problems, respectively. We use the syntactic nature of MAX SNP to define a general paradigm, {\em non-oblivious local search}, useful for developing simple yet efficient approximation algorithms. We show that such algorithms can find good approximations for all MAX SNP problems, yielding approximation ratios comparable to the best-known for a variety of specific MAX SNP-complete problems. Non-oblivious local search provably out-performs standard local search in both the degree of approximation

By: S. Khanna (Stanford Univ.), Rajeev Motwani (Stanford Univ.), Madhu Sudan and Umesh Vazirani (Univ. of CA at Berkeley)

Published in: RC20077 in 1995

LIMITED DISTRIBUTION NOTICE:

This Research Report is available. This report has been submitted for publication outside of IBM and will probably be copyrighted if accepted for publication. It has been issued as a Research Report for early dissemination of its contents. In view of the transfer of copyright to the outside publisher, its distribution outside of IBM prior to publication should be limited to peer communications and specific requests. After outside publication, requests should be filled only by reprints or legally obtained copies of the article (e.g., payment of royalties). I have read and understand this notice and am a member of the scientific community outside or inside of IBM seeking a single copy only.

2870.ps.gz