Copyright © (2006) by Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distrubuted for profit or commericial advantage. To copy otherwise, to republish, to post on servers, or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee.
Concurrency-related bugs may happen when multiple threads access shared data and interleave in ways that do not correspond to any sequential execution. Their absence is not guaranteed by the traditional notion of “data race” freedom. We present a new definition of data races in terms of 11 problematic interleaving scenarios, and prove that it is complete by showing that any execution not exhibiting these scenarios is serializable for a chosen set of locations. Our definition subsumes the traditional definition of a data race as well as high-level data races such as stale-value errors and inconsistent views.We also propose a language feature called atomic sets of locations, which lets programmers specify the existence of consistency properties between fields in objects, without specifying the properties themselves.We use static analysis to automatically infer those points in the code where synchronization is needed to avoid data races under our new definition. An important benefit of this approach is that, in general, far fewer annotations are required than is the case with existing approaches such as synchronized blocks or atomic sections. Our implementation successfully inferred the appropriate synchronization for a significant subset of Java’s Standard Collections framework.
By: Mandana Vaziri; Frank Tip; Julian Dolby
Published in: ACM SIGPLAN Notices, volume 41, (no 1), pages 334-45 in 2006
LIMITED DISTRIBUTION NOTICE:
This Research Report is available. This report has been submitted for publication outside of IBM and will probably be copyrighted if accepted for publication. It has been issued as a Research Report for early dissemination of its contents. In view of the transfer of copyright to the outside publisher, its distribution outside of IBM prior to publication should be limited to peer communications and specific requests. After outside publication, requests should be filled only by reprints or legally obtained copies of the article (e.g., payment of royalties). I have read and understand this notice and am a member of the scientific community outside or inside of IBM seeking a single copy only.
Questions about this service can be mailed to reports@us.ibm.com .