Strategic Planning for Electric Utilities Under CO2 Emissions Regulations

The expected greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions regulations in the United States are likely to transform the electricity generation business in the coming decades. While preparing for a carbon constrained future, electric utilities face a far more complex capacity planning task than they are used to. This complexity stems from uncertainty in the nature of future carbon regulations as well the cost of capital-intensive and/or market-based compliance strategies.

Independent researchers have pointed out that the current analytical tools employed by utilities are inadequate for formulating an optimal long-term capacity and compliance planning portfolio under such uncertainty. Additionally, current methods do not allow the explicit modeling of tradeoffs between the usually conflicting goals of minimizing expected portfolio costs and minimizing the uncertainty in portfolio costs. This poses a significant risk to electric utilities and their stakeholders since long term planning is a critical aspect of the utility business due to the long economic lifetime (30-60 years), long development and lead-time, and large capital costs of the generation and transmission infrastructure. The plans that are being drafted today must consider the impact of GHG emissions regulations because optimal portfolios of generation capacity with and without such considerations are likely to be significantly different from each other.

In this report, we describe a novel patent-pending integrated capacity planning framework to aid utilities doing long term capacity planning under the uncertainties of a carbonconstrained future. Our framework has the capability of modeling uncertainties in the inputs to yield a portfolio with the least expected costs within the risk tolerance of a decision maker. Unlike most current planning approaches that rely on the analysis of a relatively small number of scenarios or portfolios, our tool is aimed at generating optimal risk-modulated portfolios based on optimal abatement investments and their timings. We believe that electric utilities would need this capability for effectively planning their long-term capacity and environment compliance activities.

By: Stuart Siegel; Jayant Kalagnanam; Anshul Gupta; Dharmashankar Subramanian

Published in: RC24609 in 2008

LIMITED DISTRIBUTION NOTICE:

This Research Report is available. This report has been submitted for publication outside of IBM and will probably be copyrighted if accepted for publication. It has been issued as a Research Report for early dissemination of its contents. In view of the transfer of copyright to the outside publisher, its distribution outside of IBM prior to publication should be limited to peer communications and specific requests. After outside publication, requests should be filled only by reprints or legally obtained copies of the article (e.g., payment of royalties). I have read and understand this notice and am a member of the scientific community outside or inside of IBM seeking a single copy only.

rc24609.pdf

Questions about this service can be mailed to reports@us.ibm.com .